Choosing a Training Format

Immersive :
Sessions delivered on consecutive days
Time Spaced :
Sessions spread over several weeks
| Motivation | ||||
IMMERSIVE |
Demands ability to focus and sustain attention for several hours. Participants can build up momentum in learning when the content is delivered over consecutive days. Ideal for those who a absorb and retain knowledge in readiness for subsequent application in their workplace. |
TIME-SPACED |
||
| Shorter sessions appeal more to the majority of people whose optimal attention span will be 2-3 hours. Can also build momentum by virtue of content being interspersed with 'real-life' application, but can also prove disruptive to momentum if participants miss any sessions. Better suited to those who prefer a hands-on learning by doing approach and may be frustrated with heavily theory-biased content. |
||||
| Learning Style | ||||
IMMERSIVE |
Best suited to those who are highly motivated to engage with the training and have pre-set goals and context for developing their skills. | TIME-SPACED |
||
| Accommodates the more reluctant participants by giving them time to 'buy-in' to the training, often having experienced personal benefits after earlier sessions. | ||||
| Logistics | ||||
IMMERSIVE |
Logistically efficient in terms of travel and accommodation. Participants focus may benefit from taking a single break from the workplace. | TIME-SPACED |
||
| More time spent in repeated travel. Shorter periods away from the workplace can minimise disruption to prevailing activities. |
||||
| Results | ||||
IMMERSIVE |
Immersion is more expense efficient in terms of time, travel and accommodation but demands a high-level of continuous focus, commitment and engagement from participants to maximise knowledge retention and maintain long-term consistency in results. | TIME-SPACED |
||
| Time-spaced learning may be perceived as logistically inefficient but offers much greater consistency and likelihood of intrinsic behavioural and attitudinal change. | ||||

Public :
Participants from many companies
In-house :
Participants from your company alone
| Tailoring | ||||
PUBLIC |
Programme content is more generic and covers a wide range of topics that are pertinent to the skill sets being developed. | IN-HOUSE |
||
| Content can be tailored to meet the specific needs identified by your organisation, thereby lending greater context and potential for engaging participants and delivering specific results. | ||||
| Motivation | ||||
PUBLIC |
Participants are often more open to new learning and stretching comfort zones when distanced from workplace pre-conceptions, distractions and prevailing human politics | IN-HOUSE |
||
| Teams with a healthy human dynamic can engage, encourage and support each other to maximise the learning, context and knowledge sharing potential of in-house sessions. Individuals can often feel overly self-conscious and inhibited amidst the scrutiny of workplace peers. |
||||
| Logistics | ||||
PUBLIC |
More time spent in repeated travel. Shorter periods away from the workplace can minimise disruption to prevailing activities. |
IN-HOUSE |
||
| Logistically efficient in terms of travel and accommodation. Participants focus may benefit from taking a single break from the workplace. | ||||
| Results | ||||
PUBLIC |
Learning is enhanced by the diversity of knowledge, experience and ideas shared between participants from different organisations. Individuals are more likely to bring back new perspectives and best-practice explored in such a forum | IN-HOUSE |
||
| The opportunity to tailor content to serve the bespoke needs of a particular team, department or company can maximise the impact of any training undertaken. When aligned with the culture and values of the organisation this format can be a powerful tool for maintaining and driving optimal performance. |
||||
